Daily Diary (DD) - Day 17 of 2025

0500hrs:

On the dot for the first time this calendar year. 

....

Our vlog for today is possibly the most significant of the year:

Public Alert for the people of AJK:

#Conflict2Peace Financial Strategy in Journey from #AJK to #JKA

Aim - for the public of AJK (& its diaspora) to directly fund the formation of a genuine people's government in AJK; using strictly peaceful, ethical, democratic and legal means.

This financial strategy has emerged after almost 20 years of a struggle - in general since April 2005 and focussed since September 2009 - which gradually created the following:

JKA PUBLIC AGENCY is a unique public institution in that it is exclusively owned by the public of AJK, while it has absolutely no affiliation or commitment to or with any country or other public institution, anywhere in the world.

From its origins of almost 2 decades, it has always upheld 4 non-negotiables with all its own people (the public of AJK & its diaspora), with all its co-citizens in the rest of JKA, with all its neighbouring countries and with the rest of the world - all powers large and small. 

1) Geopolitical neutrality

2) The 'Riyasati' (People's) Reference

3) Ideological harmony & co-existence (of whatever nature: religious, political, philosophical etc.) 

4) Ecological concerns of the territory of JKA 

These have been the poles that have evolved and matured as our compass since the outset of this un-anticipated journey in April 2005. This forms the roots of a contemporary Citizen-State contract from AJK to JKA.

In recognition of all sacrifices made by our co-citizens before this era and that have been made since, this is a new dynamic era which heavily relies on economy, technology, research, law and creating the necessary people's power behind that law.

We have a choice to either resign ourselves to continue investing in a #ConflictEconomy and pay the price for coming generations, or we can begin investing in a #PeaceEconomy .

At JKA PUBLIC AGENCY we have created an elaborate financial strategy which should deliver gains of 10,000% on a 10 year fixed deposit, equivalent to 1,000 (one thousand) UK pounds (or c. 3.5 lakhs in local currency), payable over a year. Of the approximately 2,200 of our co-citizens who have financially contributed since 2012 (when we began direct public funding), they can subtract what they have accumulatively paid so far from this amount of £1,000 and pay the balance (in installments over a year if they wish).

The gains we envisage are 100 x, which means 1,000 UK pounds invested today should be worth 100,000 UK pounds in 10 year's time. These gains are estimated in line with the projected growth of the AJK economy over the next decade as we move towards a genuinely free government, whereby the current 'government' is operating in minus and when economic levers are restored here, we would convert from an economy worth less than a billion (US dollars) today, to one that is worth at least 10 billion (US dollars) in 10 year's time. During this period, JKA PUBLIC AGENCY would also be investing in the economy and thus, making better use of the growth envisaged, compared to the economy as a whole.

Those of our co-citizens who consider their financial capacity to be less than the amount requested (viz. the equivalent of £1,000 payable over a year) they can partner with other co-citizens to create shares within 1 share, according to their individual capacities. For example, if someone is capable of investing £100 they can find 9 other co-citizens who can contribute an equal share within this 1 particular share.

Every co-citizen can only buy 1 share over this 10 year period, so that every other co-citizen has an equal opportunity in becoming a shareholder.

I will be sending this note directly and individually to as many of my co-citizens as possible (beginning Fri 17 January 2025), while keeping a public statistical record of how many people have responded and in what manner at jkapublicagency.org and AJK Public Treasury's Facebook page at: facebook.com/ajkpublictreasury

If I - Tanveer Ahmed - operating on behalf of JKA PUBLIC AGENCY am not able to convince at least 1,000 of my co-citizens to part with the equivalent of £1,000 in the year 2025, then I will have to resign from working in the public interest of AJK > JKA.

I will then resort to resume living a private life for private interests where I will no longer be able to advocate or protect the national interest of JKA, as I have been doing, particularly since September 2009. I will of course, return all the money that has been provided to me by the public since 2012.

This journey which started as 'subject' to 'citizen' in April 2005 has been a uniquely testing experience for me as an individual and of course for all my well-wishers (including my family & friends). I do know that such a social experiment has never been attempted before (to be at the mercy of the public's benevolence, especially since 2012) and I don't know if such an experiment can be attempted by anybody in the future. Indeed, I'm not even sure that our people's reference (which provides us - aspiring - citizens overwhelming legal authority over the territory of JKA) will account for anything, if a genuine people's government is not restored/created in AJK in the very near future. Such have the efforts of our neighbours and global powers matured with respect to this territory that AJK is the last remaining bastion of the people's reference. This has been my compass from the outset and I have maintained its direction thus far.

Please do not hesitate to question me on this matter, which has affected us all for generations and will continue to do so unless 'we - the people' choreograph the future. 

The latter words were put forward in a discussion on global media in 2017 

reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl0D0fd5xGc&t=1315s

JKA PUBLIC AGENCY Note: #E191317012025

....

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 16 of 2025

1856hrs:

I'm inputting today's diary almost 14 hours later than intended. My routine is haywire, despite which I'm still fulfilling all my daily duties, just not in the right time frame in a daily routine context.

....

Dr Nazir Gilani continues with his documentation activism and gives his prescription on demilitarisation:

Demilitarizing Kashmir: A Call for Peace, Dialogue, and Self-Determination

The recent remarks made by the Indian Army Chief during the 77th Army Day celebrations, where he accused Pakistan of orchestrating violence in Kashmir and emphasized the induction of 15,000 additional troops in 2024, have sparked significant reactions, particularly from Pakistan. While the situation in Kashmir is undeniably complex, it is important to address the issue within the broader historical context, international commitments, and the necessity for a peaceful resolution that prioritizes the rights and aspirations of the Kashmiri people.

1. Historical Context and UN Supervised Vote:

The Kashmir dispute is not merely a military issue but a deeply political and human rights issue rooted in the promises made at the time of India’s partition and the subsequent accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India. The Government of India (GOI) has committed itself to a UN-supervised plebiscite in Kashmir, as outlined in United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 47. The resolution calls for a fair and free process where the Kashmiri people can determine their future. This commitment was reaffirmed at the 230th meeting of the UNSC in 1948, which outlined the role of Indian forces in the region as supplementary and temporary, tasked only with ensuring law and order.

However, the ongoing militarization of the region—especially the recent induction of an additional 15,000 troops in 2024—directly undermines the spirit of these original agreements and international resolutions. The heavy military presence today stands in stark contrast to the intent of UNSC Resolution 47, which sought restraint in the appearance, number, and stationing of forces in the region to avoid exacerbating tensions and to promote a peaceful resolution.

2. Britain’s Acknowledgment of the Insurgency and Diverse Stakeholders:

During the 251st meeting of the UNSC, Britain acknowledged the continuation of the insurgency in Kashmir and pointed out that the conflict involves not just India and Pakistan but also six distinct interest groups within Kashmir itself. These groups—representing various political, social, and ethnic constituencies—have long been anchored in the belief that the UN-supervised plebiscite is the ultimate solution. Their expectations, based on international commitments, have shaped the political discourse surrounding the Kashmir issue for decades.

Thus, when India’s Army Chief labels Pakistan as the “epicentre of terrorism” it oversimplifies the situation and diverts attention from the core issue: the right of the Kashmiri people to determine their own future. While external actors may play a role, the primary concern is the political status of Kashmir and the aspirations of its people. The ongoing insurgency is rooted in both local grievances and the unresolved political status of the region, and framing the issue as a purely external one fails to address these complexities. The focus should be on resolving the issue through political means, respecting the wishes of the Kashmiri people, and honouring international commitments.

3. The Need for Demilitarization:

Demilitarization of Jammu and Kashmir is essential to creating an environment conducive to peace, dialogue, and reconciliation. The continuing induction of military forces, such as the 15,000 additional troops in 2024, only serves to escalate tensions, perpetuate human rights violations, and further alienate the Kashmiri people. The commitment to reducing the military footprint in the region is a crucial step toward restoring trust and creating conditions for a peaceful resolution.

India has made a specific commitment to reduce its military presence in the region. At the 608th meeting of the UNSC, India stated that the minimum necessary force to maintain order in Kashmir was 28,000. However, the Indian government also offered, in a significant gesture, that “on complete disbandment and disarmament of the Azad Kashmir forces, and as a further contribution towards a settlement, the GOI is prepared to effect a further reduction of 7,000 to a figure of 21,000, which is the absolute and irreducible minimum.” This force would be without any supporting arms, such as armour or artillery, as India emphasized the need to avoid further militarization of the region.

This offer of reduction should be seen as a positive step towards demilitarization, but it remains inadequate if the overall approach to Kashmir continues to prioritize military means over political solutions. There is no room for militarizing Kashmir further. The region cannot be resolved by force; it is the consent of the Kashmiri people and the promise of a UN-supervised plebiscite that must prevail. The military presence cannot replace the democratic rights of the Kashmiri people, and the way forward must involve reducing the military presence while promoting dialogue, self-determination, and peace.

4. The Role of the Kashmiri People and the UN Template:

The ultimate resolution of the Kashmir issue must centre around the will of the Kashmiri people, as guaranteed by the United Nations and the commitments made by both India and Pakistan at the UNSC in 1948. The heavy militarization of the region is at odds with the political and democratic aspirations of the Kashmiri people. The UN-supervised plebiscite remains the most legitimate path forward, one that respects the rights of Kashmiris to choose their future.

As highlighted in the State Autonomy Committee Report of June 2000, Jammu and Kashmir’s provisional accession was limited to three areas—defence, communications, and foreign affairs. These restrictions must guide the future governance of the region. Any solution that involves continued militarization and repression will only deepen the divide. The focus must shift to fulfilling international promises, especially the commitment to a UN-supervised plebiscite, and to ensuring that the political rights of the Kashmiri people are fully respected.

5. A Call for Peace and Political Dialogue:

India and Pakistan, along with the international community, must move beyond military posturing and engage in genuine dialogue aimed at achieving a political resolution that respects the rights and aspirations of the Kashmiri people. The Kashmir issue cannot be solved by military means; it requires a political settlement that recognizes the legitimacy of the Kashmiri people's demand for self-determination. India’s continued military presence in Kashmir must be reconsidered in light of international commitments, and the focus should be on reducing military forces while promoting a peace process that includes all stakeholders.

The path to peace in Kashmir lies in honouring the principles of self-determination and democratic governance. The UN-supervised plebiscite remains the only legitimate solution, and India must reaffirm its commitment to this process, ensuring that the military does not stand in the way of the political aspirations of the Kashmiri people.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, JKCHR advocates for the immediate demilitarization of Jammu and Kashmir, in line with the United Nations’ framework and the promises made by both India and Pakistan. India’s offer to reduce its military presence to 21,000 troops without supporting arms should be viewed as a step towards peace, but it is essential that this reduction be part of a broader political resolution that respects the aspirations of the Kashmiri people. The solution lies not in military control but in political dialogue and the implementation of a UN-supervised plebiscite, ensuring that the people of Kashmir are the ones who determine their future.

Dr. Syed Nazir Gilani

President JKCHR

16.01.2025

Dr Nazir Gilani's Facebook post above may be commented on here

I have made the following comment there:

You are probably the only person qualified to anchor such a discussion. Demilitarisation involves creating alternative security arrangements as much as an environment of 'freedom of expression'. These are all matters of internal dynamics within the State, which - the #People of the territory of #AJK - can be credited for creating such amicable conditions, through peaceful & thoughtful mass activism.

....

Later in the evening, we continue with our daily live vlog on Facebook:

Who qualifies to work in public interest in AJK? 

Options:

1) Any individual? 

2) Any party? 

3) Any forum? 

4) Any alliance? 

5) Any committee? 

6) Any government? 

7) Any tribe? 

8) Any religious sect or other special interest group? 

Your answers please. 

As short or as long as possible? 

JKA PUBLIC AGENCY Questionnaire:  #EQ1201516012025

Additional Question:

Do you want to buy conflict stock or peace stock to earn a 10,000% gain (on 10 year fixed deposit) as individuals in the most coveted State in the world?

Follow this daily vlog here on this page (FB) Tanveer Ahmed (sahaafi) or on our dedicated TikTok account - opened on the first day of this year (2025) - @jkapublicagency1

#Conflict2Peace

#PublicPolicy

#PopularSovereignty

#1To100Economy

JKA PUBLIC AGENCY Note: #E232016012025

Responses:

(names remain anonymous at this stage but the relevant district of the respondents is mentioned:

1) Mirpur

نمبر ون (Number 1) viz. any individual

2) Bagh

ایک مشترکہ کمیٹی اور الائنس میں کوئی خاص فرق نہیں ۔ مختصر جواب یہی ہے کے کمیٹی ہو یا الائنس جانداز منشور کے ساتھ اگر جدوجہد کرے تو بہتر ہوگا

(English translation)

There isn't much difference between a collective committee and an alliance. In short, whether it is a committee or an alliance, if it struggles with a strong manifesto, that is best.

3) Muzaffarabad

#4 viz. any alliance

4) Muzaffarabad

2 viz. any party

5) Kotli

Aphc. (All Parties Hurriyat Conference)

6) Neelam

I don't think,.... that the agencies mentioned above are in the position to do something for the welfare of the people of AAJK.....all types of caretaker system are being introduced here to continue the on going situation..... because many people of the globe including India, Pakistan and China, have to earn their bread and butter from this issue that is known as Kashmir problem.

7) Poonch

Jammu Kashmir joint Awami Action Committee

8) Mirpur

To work for the welfare of humanity in the state of Jammu and Kashmir, the approach should be divided into two distinct phases:

i)The Pre-Independence Era of the Entire State:

Before the full independence of the state, it is unrealistic to rely on laws and constitutions for serving the people, as the region is currently under the administration of multiple countries. Instead of ensuring public welfare, these laws and systems have become tools for exploitation and deceit.

In this phase, a strong public alliance will be essential. People must come together, beyond all divisions, to work selflessly for the betterment of humanity.

Efforts should focus on providing basic necessities, facilitating lives, and solving immediate problems through collective action and mutual cooperation.

ii) The Post-Independence Era of the Entire State:

Once the state achieves full independence, a robust and transparent constitution must be established, ensuring equal rights and welfare for all its citizens.

This constitution should include mechanisms for real enforcement, not just theoretical provisions.

It must empower a leader who is a true well-wisher of the entire state, someone who prioritizes humanity, justice, and progress over personal or regional biases.

9) Poonch

1 🙏🏻 viz. any individual

10) UK (Guest response)

Any AJK citizen

11) Poonch

Forums and government.

Also individuals but individual efforts are often fragmented and subjective.

My Response:

Individuals also have a better chance of remaining non-partisan in public affairs. Just a thought.

Their Response (in turn):

Yes, I am the same individual. Doing my work on my own but for the people of AJK.

12) Muzaffarabad

AsSlamOAlikum, 

Hopefully you are done well, profound gratitude that you considered my opinion also means something. 

That part of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir region which we call Azad Kashmir, We have always been in a state of confusion as to whether we are free or whether we are slaves. Because the rulers who impose their rule on us sometimes say that "we are free "Azad Kashmir", sometimes they say that we will take the Freedom "Hum Ly ka Rahen Gy Azadi". 

A small region with resources three times its size has been so degraded that the majority of its population cannot live there. In the last few years, we have seen that most of the youth of Pakistan have left the country after the COVID-19 pandemic & they went and started looking for jobs in other countries. Even now, thinkers, planners, strategists and other patriots sitting in Pakistan are in shock over this... It is being repeatedly discussed that the future of Pakistan is in great danger because the youth here have left. I ask all my friends in Azad Kashmir, out of a population of 4.2 million, 2.6 million Kashmiris have almost said goodbye to their state and gone to other countries for employment. Has any ruler of Azad Kashmir, or our lawyer Pakistan, ever said anything about this? I have not met any famous person, leader, party, forum, alliance, committee, government, opposition, community, tribe, religion or sect I have never seen anyone discuss or work in a progressive manner on this important issue, or any other issue that is relevant to the people of this state.

Our hearts also ache when these situations arise before us and we are unable to do anything special even if we want to. If we talk about hope, then surely one person can come along who can change the situation in the entire state. Such a person can come in the form of a party, a forum, an alliance committee, a government or any other group, But this is just a matter of hope, and the world of dreams is built on hope. It takes hard work to create a world of real reality. 

I would absolutely say that unless our education system is modernized, we will continue to face difficulties. If today we have achieved our rights through our unity, awareness and protest, tomorrow they will bring out a new agenda and put us in harm's way. We have to move forward in our education system along with awareness. I am very impressed with the role played by the Jammu and Kashmir Joint Public Action Committee in the last two years. The entire state was united and brought awareness, and Kashmiris all over the world proudly said, "Yes, I am a Kashmiri." This is a great thing. I would like to thank all 30 members of the committee for this, But my demand is from all the youth of the Kashmiri nation that they should start working for their rights and welfare themselves. 

Allah Pak only helps those who help themselves, We, the people of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, may be few in number, but we are enough to unite our entire country of Jammu and Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan, which has been divided into pieces, and bring it back into one state. Though this determination must include the spirit that we practically play a full role in the welfare of our region. We ourselves must be capable enough to face our oppressors with equality.  The day we become capable, That will be the first day of our prosperity and our enemy will die his own death. 

Therefore I believe, none of any organization is qualified enough to work truly in a public interest but the Educated Youth and People Themselves.

13) Sudhnoti

Anyone and everyone can work in public interest as long as they know what is the public interest concerning subject matters of public interest, how to mobilise tangible and intangible resources, how to develop and sustain partnerships and manage stakeholders and risks.

14) Neelam

عوامی مفاد کے لیے اب تک کام کرنے والی  جموں کشمیر جوائنٹ عوامی ایکشن کمیٹی ہے جو عوامی مفاد کے لیے کام کر رہی ہے مخلص ہو کر

(English translation)

Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee has to date worked for public interest in a sincere manner.

15) Poonch

Option 1) Any Individual 

Reasoning for my answer: state must treat all her statesmen equal.

16) Sudhnoti

4 viz. any alliance

17) Mirpur

"I firmly believe that only loyal and dedicated residents of Jammu and Kashmir, who genuinely prioritize the welfare and development of the region, should be considered for leadership or decision-making roles. It shouldn't matter which political party, sect, or community (bradri) they belong to, as long as their intentions are true and they are committed to serving the people, rather than acting as mere puppets for external influences."

18) Mirpur

Anyone who has the collective interest at heart and is motivated solely in public interest and not personal interest

19) Kotli

Any government

20) Jhelum Valley (Hattian)

In AJK, any individual, party, forum, alliance, committee, government, tribe, or group can work in the public interest; provided their efforts are inclusive, transparent, and focused on collective welfare. 

The key is to prioritize public needs over personal or partisan agendas. The Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee is a notable example of such effective and consistent advocacy, addressing fundamental public issues with integrity and commitment.

21) Neelam

Whatever little is being done, is being done by the Joint Awami Action Committee. Apart from that; there is no movement, party, committee or other (organisational) formation doing anything in public interest. This is the truth. Even if someone wants to do something in public interest, they do not have the support of the public. Whatever you are doing, I am with you unconditionally. Whenever you need my support, you will find me standing with you.

22) Sudhnoti

Some individuals only.

23) Muzaffarabad

1 viz. any individual

24) Bagh

"Any individual" who is a citizen of AJK.

25) Muzaffarabad

ایکشن کمیٹی

جموں کشمیر جوائنٹ عوامی ایکشن

کمیٹث

(English translation)

Action Committee

Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action

Committed

26) Haveli

Action committee

27) Kotli

Every individual should be selected through a computer-based, tamper-proof system that combines psychometric tests to ensure recruitment is based solely on merit. The entire process must be made as transparent as possible. Those serving our nation should receive top-tier salaries to attract the most qualified candidates. This approach will ensure they feel rewarded, reducing the likelihood of them leaving the job or engaging in risky behaviour.

28) ?

JKGB Awami Action Committee

29) Sudhnoti

عوامی ایکشن کمیٹی جوائنٹ عوامی ایکشن کمیٹی ریاست جم کشمیر کے حقوق کے لیے جس طرح کام کر رہی ہے میرے اندازے میں اگر اسی طرح ہم سب متفق ہو کر کام کریں تو ریاست جموں کشمیر کی ازادی خود مختاری یا لوگوں کے حقوق ان کو مل سکتے ہیں

(English translation)

The manner in which Joint Awami Action Committee is working for the collective rights of the people of Kashmir, it is my estimation that if we all agree to work together then the freedom, independence of the State of Jammu Kashmir or the rights of the people can be obtained.

30) Kotli

عوام کی حکومت ہونی چاہیے

(English translation)

The public should have their own government

31) Bagh

1 viz. any individual

&

5 viz. any committee

….

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 15 of 2025

1532hrs:

Today's input is being written 10 hours and 32 minutes later than intended. 

Although I did get up at around midday, I didn't go to sleep till around 0400hrs. 

....

Dr Nazir Gilani continues with his energetic thrust to address the shortfall in documentation of our people: 

Nationalist groups in Azad Kashmir

To critically assess the position of the nationalist groups in Azad Kashmir, it is essential to recognize that their internal fragmentation and lack of a unified vision undermine their capacity to propose a credible alternative to the United Nations (UN) framework. 

The ongoing splintering of these groups raises questions not only about their legitimacy but also about their ability to offer a coherent, sustainable solution to the Kashmir issue. Before any departure from the UN framework can be entertained, these groups must first demonstrate their ability to unify, create a compelling vision, and present a feasible plan that can engage not only India and Pakistan but also the international community, particularly UN member states.

1. The Challenge of Unity: Legitimacy and Representation

The nationalist groups in Azad Kashmir are far from united. Their fragmentation into multiple factions with differing ideologies and visions for the future of Kashmir weakens their ability to project a coherent and unified narrative. This disunity raises a fundamental question: if these groups cannot agree among themselves on basic principles, how can they credibly claim to represent the diverse aspirations of the Kashmiri people as a whole?

In a conflict as complex and entrenched as Kashmir, unity is not merely a political nicety; it is a prerequisite for legitimacy. A fragmented political landscape weakens any attempt to engage in meaningful dialogue with India, Pakistan, or the international community. To be taken seriously, these groups must first show they can overcome their internal divisions and present a common, coherent platform that reflects the interests of the Kashmiri people. Without this unity, their proposals risk being seen as self-serving or reflective of a narrow agenda rather than the collective will of the people they claim to represent.

2. The Need for Credible Symbols of Authority

Beyond unity, nationalist groups must also establish credible symbols of authority that can effectively engage with key stakeholders, including India, Pakistan, and international actors. The ability to communicate and negotiate with these parties requires a robust political structure that commands both internal legitimacy and international recognition.

In practical terms, this means that these groups must not only present a unified vision but also demonstrate that they have the institutional capacity to manage the political, economic, and social complexities of Kashmir. They need to have mechanisms in place for governance, the protection of human rights, and the resolution of internal disputes. These groups should offer a clear political framework that details how they intend to engage with India and Pakistan, ensuring that their efforts are seen as credible by the global community.

Without such symbols of credibility—be they through formal political bodies, democratic processes, or international diplomatic channels—the nationalist factions risk remaining marginalized in the broader political discourse. This lack of institutional maturity and authority will hinder their ability to form meaningful partnerships with other states and organizations, ultimately limiting their capacity to negotiate a lasting solution.

3. The UN Template: A Pathway to Inclusivity and Dissent

The United Nations framework, shaped by years of international diplomacy and legal deliberation, offers a structured approach to resolving the Kashmir dispute. The core principle of the UN's involvement in Kashmir is the right of the Kashmiri people to self-determination, exercised through a UN-supervised plebiscite. This framework has the broad support of the international community, providing a neutral, internationally recognized mechanism to address the competing claims of India, Pakistan, and the Kashmiri people.

The beauty of the UN process lies in its inclusivity—it ensures that all parties, including dissenting voices, are heard and respected. It acknowledges that the solution cannot come from one side imposing its will upon the other but must be a product of dialogue and mutual recognition. The process of self-determination is thus built on the foundation of respecting differences and ensuring that no group is marginalized.

Given this, any nationalist group seeking to deviate from the UN framework must propose an alternative that matches or exceeds this level of inclusivity and fairness. They must provide a solution that not only satisfies the aspirations of the Kashmiri people but also accommodates the legitimate concerns of India and Pakistan. Crucially, any alternative must involve mechanisms for peaceful coexistence, respect for dissent, and the protection of human rights for all communities in the region.

4. The Burden of Constructing a Credible Alternative

If the nationalist groups are to move away from the UN framework, they must demonstrate that they have a well-defined, practical, and internationally acceptable alternative. The burden of proof falls on them to:

• Present a Unified Vision for Kashmir’s Future: 

A fragmented political landscape weakens any argument for departing from the UN process. These groups must demonstrate their ability to come together and craft a vision that reflects the aspirations of the Kashmiri people as a whole. This vision must be inclusive and forward-thinking, addressing the needs of diverse communities, including ethnic, religious, and political minorities.

• Create a Legal and Constitutional Framework: 

The UN's involvement in Kashmir has always been framed within a clear legal and constitutional framework, one that recognizes the principle of self-determination and ensures that the rights of all parties are respected. Nationalist groups must show that they can offer a robust legal alternative that guarantees these same principles of fairness, justice, and protection of rights, while also offering an enforceable mechanism for resolving disputes.

• Demonstrate Governance Capacity: 

These groups must provide a blueprint for governance that extends beyond merely political rhetoric. A credible template must address economic development, social welfare, human rights, and law and order in Kashmir. Without a demonstrated ability to govern effectively, their proposals will remain abstract and unconvincing.

• Engage International Stakeholders: 

The solution to the Kashmir issue will require the buy-in of multiple international actors, including India, Pakistan, and UN member states. The nationalist groups must prove that they have the diplomatic and political acumen to engage with these countries and gain their trust. This requires presenting a solution that is not only seen as fair and just but also pragmatic and achievable within the existing geopolitical realities.

5. The Need for a Template for the Future

A critical flaw in the nationalist groups' current approach is their failure to offer a clear and actionable vision for Kashmir’s future. Moving beyond rhetoric and historical grievances, these groups must present a comprehensive template that outlines how they plan to build a sustainable and peaceful future for Kashmir. This includes establishing political institutions, promoting economic development, and ensuring the protection of human rights for all people in the region.

Any solution that seeks to challenge the UN framework must be able to engage both regional and global powers, offering a credible path forward that reflects the desires of the Kashmiri people while ensuring peace and stability in the broader South Asian context.

Conclusion: A Coherent, Viable Alternative

In conclusion, the nationalist groups in Azad Kashmir face a significant challenge: they must move beyond their internal divisions and present a unified, credible vision for Kashmir’s future. The UN framework provides a neutral, internationally recognized mechanism for resolving the dispute, based on the principles of self-determination and inclusivity. For any alternative to be taken seriously, it must provide a clear political framework, establish credible symbols of authority, and engage India, Pakistan, and the international community in a meaningful dialogue.

Until these nationalist groups can demonstrate the ability to build such a framework—one that respects dissent, ensures inclusivity, and has the capacity to govern effectively—the UN process remains the most viable and legitimate pathway to resolving the Kashmir issue.

Dr. Syed Nazir Gilani

President JKCHR

15.01.2025

Dr Sahaab's post on Facebook can be accessed here

I suppose this is a basis for a genuine introspective discussion. 

...

Our evening (pre-midnight) live vlog on Facebook:

An example of inherent weaknesses in our approach to documentation activism (ref yesterday's live video):

Many of our co-citizens and especially those who were affiliated with the Joint Awami Action Committee #JAAC , were arrested from their homes in the early hours of 09 May 2024, whereby local #AJK police marshalled by #Pakistan 's clandestine agencies broke into many people's houses and physically tortured many an activist. In the following days and weeks many other activists experienced human rights violations too. 

I asked some of those responsible in JAAC to send me brief video testaments of each aggrieved co-citizen, so that I could translate then into English, to document and create a comprehensive report. 

Which I would then send to every prominent human rights organisation in the world and all those countries that have stakes in Pakistan. 

This would have added strength to #RightsMovementAJK and narrowed the possibility of Pakistan conducting such operations here ever again. 

However, not a single such video statement has been sent to me. 

Follow this daily vlog here on this page (FB) Tanveer Ahmed (sahaafi) or on our dedicated TikTok account - opened on the first day of this year (2025) - @jkapublicagency1

#Conflict2Peace

#PublicPolicy

#PopularSovereignty

#1To100Economy

JKA PUBLIC AGENCY Note: #E231015012025

....

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 14 of 2025

1207hrs:

Today's input is arriving 7 hours and 7 minutes later than it should have. 

....

I just came across this Facebook post by Carousel, though it was posted on the 8th of January: 

“The people born between 1975 and 1995 are the most special generation of all time, and here's why:

They were born between two generations: one before the internet and before technology took control, and the following generation.

The generation before 1985 was old-school and believed in hard, consistent work, while the next generation believes in smart work.

This generation has seen it all: radio, television, Mario Bros, Nokia, cassettes, VHS, DVDs, Nintendo, PS4, video stores, Netflix, Snapchat, and virtual reality.

This is the generation that knows tradition and questions and judges based on reasoning. The previous generation didn’t ask questions, and the next one doesn’t know tradition.

The bridge between the industrial era and the internet age, they understand both sides based on experience. This generation should be leading everything. The older generation doesn’t understand what’s happening now, and the next generation doesn’t know where what they have comes from.”

I would have thought 1972 applies too.

....

Our pre-midnight Facebook live vlog:

Today's lesson:

4 types of activism simultaneously necessary in AJK:

1) Documentation Activism

2) Crowd Activism

3) Forum Activism

4) Mass Activism

Public policy development is a stage beyond that which ultimately uses #DirectDemocracy to establish Popular Sovereignty in AJK, that would open the door for the rest of JKA to restore their #Right2Rule .

Follow this daily vlog here on this page (FB) Tanveer Ahmed (sahaafi) or on our dedicated TikTok account - opened on the first day of this year (2025) - @jkapublicagency1

#Conflict2Peace

#PublicPolicy

#PopularSovereignty

#1To100Economy

JKA PUBLIC AGENCY Note: #E233014012025

....

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 13 of 2025

1505hrs:

Inputting today's diary entry 10 hours and 5 minutes later than intended. 

I did fall asleep soon after 0130hrs but couldn't get up till soon after midday. I have been busy elsewhere since. 

I have long realised that I have to drastically change some of my own routine, in order to deliver results to our people. 

....

Our daily (pre-midnight) vlog on Facebook Live:

Connectivity issues as much as communication issues affect how we mutually understand each other as co-citizens of #AJK dreaming of a fully functioning - internally integrated and externally acknowledged - #JKA . 

We have to break the barrier of overcoming personal interest for the sake of public interest. 

We must practice, experiment and fail many times before we succeed. 

Follow this daily vlog here on this page (FB) Tanveer Ahmed (sahaafi) or on our dedicated TikTok account - opened on the first day of this year (2025) - @jkapublicagency1

#Conflict2Peace

#PublicPolicy

#PopularSovereignty

#1To100Economy

JKA PUBLIC AGENCY Note: #E234013012025

....

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 12 of 2025

0504hrs:

Inputting my daily diary just 4 minutes later than intended. 

.... 

It is abominable what our friend Javed Qureshi (Numberdaar) of the Tangir Valley in Gilgit is facing as punishment for struggling for his people's basic rights. Not only has he faced imprisonment but his family is being targeted too. His wife Nashad Parveen, who has done so much to ensure female education in the region has been denied access to her bank account, amongst other forms of ostracism. 

Awami Action Committee Gilgit Baltistan Media Cell has posted this active couple's predicament as follows:

This couple's predicament has been covered by other media sources too:

....

Our readers (followers, monitors etc.) shouldn't forget that we are into our 852nd daily episode on X (formerly Twitter) today, which has been achieved in just 853 days. We just missed out on 1 day (Day 32) due to my own shortcoming. We haven't been able to embed our daily Space here for various reasons but it should be remembered that this is just another of our daily features, in our day to day activity for our land and people:

 

All issues - big & small - which concern the lives and livelihood of the many, merit attention and resolution. 

Today's interview will give us much insight into what the #AJK diaspora in the #UK lacks - despite decades of social settlement and economic upliftment there - which ultimately hinders the prosperity of their homeland. 

Our professional diaspora in particular, can learn a lot from this exchange. 

JKA PUBLIC AGENCY Note: #E001112012025

....

Today's pre-midnight vlog on Facebook Live:

There is much that our people need to learn (as soon as possible) on this organisational journey to freedom with responsibility, where #AJK becomes #JKA , by converting our region's #ConflictEconomy into a #PeaceEconomy . 

Whereby we ensure our territory provides 0 justifiable threats to the rest of the world while growing our economy by 100x over the next 10 years. 

4 qualities we need to inculcate into our behaviour:

1) Meritocracy

2) Inclusivity

3) Transparency

4) Accountability

Follow this daily vlog here on this page (FB) Tanveer Ahmed (sahaafi) or on our dedicated TikTok account - opened on the first day of this year (2025) - @jkapublicagency1

#Conflict2Peace

#PublicPolicy

#PopularSovereignty

#1To100Economy

JKA PUBLIC AGENCY Note: #E233012012025

....

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 11 of 2025

1130hrs:

6 hours and 30 minutes later than intended. A problematic back has been affecting my productivity over the past few days. 

....

Further analysis of the status of AJK as a territory is provided by Dr Nazir Gilani today:

A Dereliction of the Kashmir Cause

The Government of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) has grievously misdirected itself by neglecting its constitutional role in the Kashmir dispute, especially as outlined in the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP) Resolutions. These resolutions bind AJK to work alongside Pakistan in securing the right to self-determination for the Kashmiri people, primarily through a plebiscite. However, the Azad Kashmir governments have consistently failed to discharge this responsibility, which has undermined the legal and moral case for Kashmir’s self-determination.

1. Breach of Constitutional Mandate: Azad Kashmir’s role is not merely as a local authority but as a constitutional partner in the framework established by the UNCIP Resolutions. These resolutions call for joint action with Pakistan to facilitate a plebiscite for Kashmir. The AJK leadership’s claim of being constrained by its status as a local authority is an excuse designed to avoid fulfilling this duty. The government's failure to act has debilitated Kashmir's international standing and weakened the movement for self-determination.

2. Political Compromise at the Cost of Kashmir’s Cause: The leadership in AJK has consistently prioritized maintaining political power and personal privileges over the interests of the Kashmiri people. This was evident in their inadequate response to India's illegal actions of August 5, 2019. Rather than rallying for a strategic and unified response, the AJK government has been preoccupied with political optics that have failed to bring meaningful change or progress to the Kashmir cause. Their pursuit of power has come at the expense of the core issue: the right of the Kashmiri people to decide their future.

3. Corruption and Questionable Wealth: A striking feature of the political leadership in Azad Kashmir is the stark disparity between their humble beginnings and the unexplained wealth they accumulate while in power. This raises serious questions about their motives. The continued personal enrichment of those in power, coupled with their neglect of the Kashmir cause, has led to public disillusionment and undermined their credibility. The leadership’s indulgence in luxury and political compromises directly harms the integrity of the Kashmir struggle.

4. Failure to Respond to India's Aggression: A key moment of failure was the Azad Kashmir government’s inaction following India's revocation of Article 370 on August 5, 2019, which further entrenched the illegal occupation of Jammu and Kashmir. Instead of mobilizing support and presenting a united, forceful response, the AJK leadership chose a path of inaction, opting for ineffective gestures over substantive resistance. This passivity has further marginalized the Kashmiri voice in international forums and allowed India to proceed unchecked in its efforts to alter the region's status.

5. Pakistan’s Responsibility: Pakistan has a higher burden in guiding and assisting Azad Kashmir in fulfilling its constitutional obligations. As the primary international advocate for Kashmir, Pakistan must ensure that Azad Kashmir’s leadership is not only politically engaged but also ethically and legally committed to advancing Kashmir's right to self-determination. This requires a concerted effort to reset the strategic approach, ensuring that both Pakistan and Azad Kashmir act in tandem to fulfill their joint constitutional responsibilities under the UNCIP Resolutions.

6. Damage to the Kashmir Jurisprudence: By failing to act, the Azad Kashmir governments have significantly weakened the legal framework that underpins the Kashmir dispute. Their inaction has eroded the moral and legal arguments for Kashmir's right to self-determination, both domestically and internationally. The longer Azad Kashmir’s leadership remains passive, the more difficult it will be to present a united front that respects the pluralistic nature of Kashmir’s society, which includes Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Christians and others, as recognized by the United Nations.

Conclusion: 

The Government of Azad Jammu and Kashmir has not only misdirected itself but also harmed the Kashmir cause through neglect, political compromise, and failure to act on its constitutional duties. Pakistan, as a key partner, must recalibrate its approach, ensuring that Azad Kashmir fulfills its constitutional role in the struggle for self-determination. 

This is not merely a political challenge but a moral and legal imperative, one that requires decisive leadership, transparency, and an unwavering commitment to the rights of the Kashmiri people.

Dr. Syed Nazir Gilani

President JKCHR

11.01.2025

One may comment directly on Dr Nazir Gilani's post on Facebook here

....

Our pre-midnight Facebook Live Vlog:

We have regularly notified our co-citizens that we have been sold - as a territory and effectively as a people - by our occupiers to each other, to #China and to other influential countries in the world. 

The alarm bells have been rung on many an occasion on our almost 2 decade old journey. 

We can continue whatever we are doing for #JKA but we must incorporate #Documentation into our #Activism in #AJK . 

Follow this daily vlog here on this page (FB) Tanveer Ahmed (sahaafi) or on our dedicated TikTok account - opened on the first day of this year (2025) - @jkapublicagency1

#Conflict2Peace

#PublicPolicy

#PopularSovereignty

#1To100Economy

JKA PUBLIC AGENCY Note: #E231511012025

....

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 10 of 2025

1040hrs:

5 hours and 40 minutes later than intended. 

....

Dr Nazir Gilani is making most optimum use of his time and expertise for the nation of 'Kashmiris' in particular. It is one of the tragedies of this beautiful land that its people do not recognise merit among themselves. They seek unjustifiable strength from outside while repeatedly overlooking strength on the inside, between their own. In the case of the AJK Government, who needs a roadmap when its patrons and appeasers are content with swinging around a roundabout endlessly?

Actionable Roadmap on Kashmir

Honourable Prime Minister,

It is a surprise and a disappointment that, after 77 years, 2 months, and 17 days since the establishment of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK), and 77 years and 10 days since the Kashmir issue was first raised at the United Nations (UN), we are still unable to produce a clear, actionable roadmap for the Kashmiri people's freedom.

This delay is not just an administrative failure; it is a profound injustice to those who have suffered for generations. Kashmir has lost a whole generation, and the impact of this deficit will have far-reaching consequences, particularly in the context of any future UN-supervised vote on self-determination. The region is not only dismembered but has also been stripped of its legislature, its special rights, and its dignity. India, a UN member, has blatantly violated its Charter obligations and the UN template on Kashmir.

On January 5, you called upon the All Parties Hurriyat Conference (APHC) to deliver a  “clear” and “actionable” roadmap for Kashmir’s freedom. While your intent is commendable, this request raises a series of urgent and critical questions that must be addressed now, rather than later.

1. Why Start From Scratch?

The AJK Government was established in October 1947, and the APHC has adhered to a constitutional discipline since 1993—aligned with the UN’s framework on Kashmir. Given this history, why are we still asking the APHC to come up with something new? Why hasn’t the AJK Government already produced a clear roadmap based on these established principles and historical momentum? We have frameworks, principles, and international support already in place—why are we failing to act on them?

2. Leveraging Existing Legal Frameworks

The AJK Government operates under the 1970 and 1974 Acts, which provide a strong legal foundation to address the Kashmir issue. These acts, combined with the UN’s resolutions, lay out a clear path forward. Why is the AJK Government not using these frameworks to advance the Kashmir cause immediately? Instead of asking the APHC to reinvent the wheel, shouldn’t the existing legal and constitutional mechanisms be fully utilized to advance our case on the global stage?

3. The 9-Point Formula of 2019

In May 2019, the President of AJK presented a 9-point formula to the OIC Contact Group on Kashmir in Jeddah. If it was duly debated and approved, what happened to it? Why is the APHC being tasked with coming up with something new in 2025. APHC has a constitutional roadmap.

4. India’s Violations: What Has Changed?

India, as a UN member state, has blatantly violated its obligations by revoking Kashmir’s special status on August 5, 2019, in direct contradiction to the spirit and letter of UN resolutions. Given this violation, why is the AJK Government now calling for a new “roadmap”? Shouldn’t the international community, led by the “AJK Government”, be holding India accountable for its unlawful actions, rather than reimagining the Kashmir cause from scratch?

5. The AJK Government's Role:

It is profoundly concerning that, after all these years, the AJK Government is still waiting for the APHC to create a roadmap. The responsibility for action has long been with the AJK Government. Why, after 77 years, is the government still not prepared to lead the charge? A coherent, well-thought-out strategy should have been in place decades ago, yet here we are asking the APHC to step in and fill the void. What specific actions will the AJK Government take to lead the struggle, to bring Kashmir’s case to the international stage, and to hold India accountable for its actions?

Conclusion:

Prime Minister, while your call for a “clear” and “actionable” roadmap is necessary, the reality is that we are far beyond the point where such a request should have been made. The roadmap should already exist, based on the frameworks and agreements that have been in place for decades. The 9-point formula of 2019, the UN resolutions, and the AJK Government’s own constitutional frameworks already provide the groundwork for a comprehensive, actionable strategy.

It is time for leadership, not procrastination. Kashmir’s cause deserves a strategy that reflects its historical and legal rights. It deserves a plan that holds India accountable for its violations of international law and reasserts the Kashmiri people’s right to self-determination. We need a roadmap, but we already have the tools and frameworks to create it. The question is: when will we use them?

Dr. Syed Nazir Gilani

President JKCHR

10.01.2025

 

One may comment directly on Dr Nazir Gilani's post on Facebook here

....

We continue with our daily vlog via Facebook Live:

Our people have always been in search of short cuts to resolve an increasingly complex and entangled problem viz. restoring the people's #Right2Rule in #AJK > #JKA 

They will have to follow the right sequence viz. 

1) Securing a public mandate from over 95% of the voting population. 

2) Identify political representatives from each political constituency, while ensuring each constituency has an equally proportionate population. 

3) Fulfilling all technical (legal, constitutional, social, economic, security etc.) requirements. 

4) Operate a genuinely free government in AJK that can increase the economic livelihood opportunities of the people 100x over. 

Making or joining a political party are not sufficient to fulfill the above process, though their role in the second part of the sequence is crucial. 

#Conflict2Peace

#PublicPolicy

#PopularSovereignty

#1To100Economy

JKA PUBLIC AGENCY Note: #E235510012025

....

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 9 of 2025

1130hrs:

6 and a half hours later than intended. It's the beginning part of the sleep cycle that needs addressing, as last night it began at c. 0230hrs.

The lower part of my back is also experiencing acute pain since yesterday morning. 

.... 

We continue to mirror Dr Nazir Gilani's analysis on this platform, making the most of his presence in the neighbourhood:

Special status of Azad Kashmir

Azad Kashmir's Special Status and the Need for Understanding and Enforcement

The status of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) remains a complex and highly debated issue within the broader Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan. However, there is no question that Azad Kashmir has a special status, and this status needs to be understood, respected, and enforced, both in terms of its unique historical context and its legal and political framework, as prescribed by Pakistan's constitution and the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP).

1. Historical and Legal Context of Azad Kashmir’s Special Status

The Standstill Agreement of 15 August 1947 between Jammu and Kashmir and Pakistan marks the beginning of the dispute over Kashmir, setting the stage for what has become a prolonged political conflict between India and Pakistan. While India has integrated its portion of Jammu and Kashmir into its political and constitutional framework, Pakistan assumed a different approach toward the territory under its control, leading to the creation of Azad Kashmir.

Azad Kashmir was never intended to be a fully integrated province of Pakistan. Instead, it was envisioned as a temporary administrative set-up that would function as a provisional government until the ultimate political status of the region could be determined through a UN-supervised plebiscite. This arrangement was solidified by the UNCIP (United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan), which monitored the situation in Kashmir following the 1947 partition.

The UNCIP’s role in this context is crucial because it was explicitly tasked with overseeing the governance and political situation in Azad Kashmir, which was deemed a local authority under its supervision, rather than a fully recognized international entity. This unique status underscores the fact that Azad Kashmir is distinct from other regions and is not a fully sovereign or integrated part of Pakistan. It remains in a state of administrative limbo, with a provisional status awaiting a final decision by the people of the region.

2. Legal Foundation of Azad Kashmir’s Special Status in the Constitution of Pakistan

The Constitution of Pakistan, particularly Article 257, reinforces the special status of Azad Kashmir by explicitly stating that the region’s future relationship with Pakistan should be decided by the will of the people of Jammu and Kashmir, in accordance with the results of a UN-supervised plebiscite. This article acknowledges that the region's relationship with Pakistan is provisional and must ultimately be determined by a free expression of the Kashmiri people's wishes.

Article 257 reflects the commitment of the Pakistani government to respecting the principle of self-determination for the people of Kashmir, a right that was guaranteed under international law, particularly as outlined in UN resolutions. The special status of Azad Kashmir, as reflected in Article 257, provides a legal framework under which the region's governance and political alignment are inherently subject to change based on the outcome of this plebiscite.

3. Azad Kashmir as a "Local Authority" Under UNCIP Supervision

The UNCIP framework further emphasizes the transitory and provisional nature of Azad Kashmir’s governance. The region is described as a local authority, and its governance is subject to oversight, not through military or direct intervention, but through diplomatic and supervisory channels under the Commission’s guidance. This means that while Azad Kashmir is allowed to govern its internal affairs, its status as a fully autonomous or permanently integrated part of Pakistan has never been settled.

It is vital to clarify that this “local authority” status does not mean Azad Kashmir is without recognition or sovereignty. Rather, it indicates that Azad Kashmir’s autonomy and self-governance exist within a temporary framework until the final status of Jammu and Kashmir is resolved through the plebiscite process, which was initially proposed in UN resolutions and remains the basis for international law in the region.

4. The 1974 Act and the Special Role of Azad Kashmir

The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974 further entrenches the idea of Azad Kashmir as a provisional government with a distinct special status. This act establishes a self-governing framework for Azad Kashmir, creating the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly and the Prime Minister's office, which exercise powers over the region’s day-to-day governance, while maintaining the relationship with Pakistan based on the principle of UN-supervised plebiscite.

It is important to note that the Act of 1974 explicitly recognizes that the primary objective of the region's governance is to provide good governance and better administration until the final determination of Jammu and Kashmir’s political status through a free and fair plebiscite. The recognition of this temporary governance structure emphasizes that Azad Kashmir’s governance is based on a framework of special administrative autonomy that must be understood as a stepping stone toward a final, democratic resolution of the Kashmir dispute.

5. Pakistan’s Role and Responsibilities

Pakistan itself acknowledges that it has assumed the responsibility of overseeing Azad Kashmir's governance, in line with its role in the larger Kashmir issue. This responsibility is defined within the UNCIP framework, which, while not military in nature, underscores the fact that Azad Kashmir's political future is subject to international oversight until the plebiscite takes place. Pakistan also affirms that the relationship between Azad Kashmir and the rest of Pakistan should ultimately be determined by the people of Jammu and Kashmir, in line with the provisions of Article 257 of Pakistan’s constitution.

Thus, Pakistan's role is not one of direct control or annexation but of facilitation and oversight in the region’s transition toward a final political settlement, as determined by the principle of self-determination. This highlights the special and provisional status of Azad Kashmir within the larger context of the Kashmir dispute.

6. The Need for Enforcement and Understanding of Azad Kashmir’s Special Status

Given the historical, political, and legal context outlined above, it is crucial to understand and enforce the special status of Azad Kashmir, which is defined by both its legal framework and the internationally recognized process of determining the region’s future through a UN-supervised plebiscite. The region is not a fully integrated part of Pakistan, nor is it an independent entity; it exists in a unique and special status that acknowledges the temporary nature of its governance.

To ensure that Azad Kashmir's special status is respected, it is essential that Pakistan, India, and the international community continue to adhere to the principle of self-determination and uphold the UN’s role in facilitating a final resolution through a fair and impartial plebiscite. Any attempt to change this status unilaterally or to ignore the will of the Kashmiri people, as expressed through the plebiscite, would be a violation of the principle of international law and the rights of the people of Jammu and Kashmir.

Conclusion

Azad Kashmir’s special status is firmly embedded in both historical agreements and the legal framework of Pakistan. It is a provisional, autonomous, and self-governing entity with a temporary role until the final political status of the region is determined. The relationship between Azad Kashmir and Pakistan, and its future integration or independence, must ultimately be decided by the people of Jammu and Kashmir, as per the principle of self-determination enshrined in international law. Enforcing and respecting this special status is not only a matter of legal necessity but also of moral and political integrity in the pursuit of peace and justice for the people of Kashmir.

Dr. Syed Nazir Gilani

President JKCHR

09.01.2025

One may comment directly on Dr Nazir Gilani's post on Facebook here

I have pointed out that - ultimately - the people of AJK themselves have to find a way out of this limbo, which doesn't favour them at a practical level.

....

This evening's vlog on Facebook Live:

It is important that I - Tanveer Ahmed - do not just praise the public of #AJK for all its virtues and good deeds but that I point out its inherent weaknesses too. 

Without addressing these weaknesses, we will not be able to restore the people's #Right2Rule in this territory. 

A fundamental weakness in our people's thinking is their general attitude to public finance. They will publicly fund activity on a spontaneous, incidental, emotional or temporary basis but they will rarely even consider funding a prolonged institutional mechanism to address the ailments in #Governance , that they so often curse and criticise. 

Our people usually rely on miracles in this regard. 

#Conflict2Peace

#PublicPolicy

#PopularSovereignty

#1To100Economy

JKA PUBLIC AGENCY Note: #E234209012025

....