Visitors

Showing posts with label Mohra. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mohra. Show all posts

Tuesday, 2 June 2026

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 153 of 2026

1022hrs:

Sleeping earlier and waking earlier with incremental improvements every day is the optimum strategy.

There's a lot going on in our territory and our direct occupiers (the Pakistani State) seem to be spiralling back to their old tactics of trying to force circumstances in their favour. This is a foolish strategy which may have worked pre 2023 but is doomed to fail in the current scenario, where each and every village of AJK is determined to continue incrementally obtaining the basic rights they have been deprived of since 1947, with strong back up from our diaspora (especially in the UK).

....  

Haroon Shamsi vs. The State of Pakistan

The above named gentleman is an aspiring State citizen of Jammu Kashmir & Allied (areas), living in the village of Mohra Dhruti in tehsil Nikyaal, adjacent to the LOC. He has recently been harassed by a Pakistani clandestine operative, who goes by the name of 'Kamran' and is apparently deputed to that region. The grounds of this harassment are a couple of short WhatsApp notes on the subject of 12 refugee seats in Pakistan devoted to the AJK Assembly, ostensibly to provide political & administrative representation to those 'Muslims' of the State who had to flee from the other side of JKA post 1947, which are under the microscope as the Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JK JAAC) is adamant that they are an unnecessary burden on the government in AJK, that they have nothing to do with the 'Kashmir Question' and they do not adhere to the mutual rights & responsibilities needed for taxation & representation.

Like thousands of other aspiring co-citizens of AJK Haroon Shamsi has also expressed his views in a couple of short messages via WhatsApp. The text (plus English translation) will be presented here followed by the threatening audio sent by this 'agency operative' to Haroon Shamsi.

Message No 1 of 2:

1947

سے 1974 تک یعنی 27 سال تک مہاجرین کی 12 نشستیں موجود نہیں تھیں پھر بھی مسئلہ کشمیر زندہ تھا۔

1974

سے 2026 تک یہ نشستیں موجود ہیں تو کیا اس دوران مسئلہ کشمیر حل ہو گیا؟

حقیقت یہ ہے کہ ان نشستوں کے ہونے یا نہ ہونے سے مسئلہ کشمیر کی حیثیت میں کوئی بنیادی تبدیلی نہیں آئی۔ البتہ ان نشستوں نے سیاسی انجینئرنگ اقتدار کے توازن پر اثراندازی اور مخصوص طبقات کو نوازنے کا ذریعہ ضرور فراہم کیا۔

اگر ان نشستوں کا مقصد مسئلہ کشمیر کو اجاگر کرنا تھا تو نصف صدی سے زائد عرصہ گزرنے کے باوجود اس کا کوئی عملی نتیجہ سامنے نہیں آیا۔

لہٰذا وقت آ گیا ہے کہ مہاجرین کی 12 نشستوں کو ختم کیا جائے ۔

یہ بارہ نشستیں صرف سیاسی جوڑ توڑ کے لیے رکھی گئی ہیں۔ مسلہ کشمیر سے انکا کوئی تعلق نہیں ۔ 

English translation:

From 1947 to 1974 (that is 27 years) there weren't 12 (Legislative Assembly) seats reserved for refugees, yet the 'Kashmir Issue' remained alive.

From 1974 to 2026 these (12 refugee seats) have existed. In this period, has the 'Kashmir Issue' been resolved?

In actual fact, whether or not these (12 refugee) seats exist hasn't made any fundamental difference to the status of the 'Kashmir Issue'. However, these seats have certainly enabled opportunity for political engineering, affected the balance of power (in the Assembly) and provided favour (or reward) to certain (specific) interest groups. 

If the purpose of these seats was to raise awareness about the Kashmir Issue then despite over half a century elapsing, no practical result has ever emerged.

Thus, the time has come to terminate these 12 seats for refugees.

These 12 seats have only been used (kept) to make or break political alliances. They have no significance in relation the 'Kashmir Issue'.

Message No 2 of 2:

اگرپاکستان کےحکمرانوں کوکشمیری مہاجرین سےاتناہی پیارھےتو انکوپاکستان کی اسمبلی میں 12نشستیں دےدیں ۔  ویسےبھی وہ رہتے توپاکستان میں ھیں، انکاآذادکشمیرکےمعاملات سےکیالینادینا؟ 

English translation:

If Pakistan's ruling elite have so much love & affection for Kashmiri refugees, then they should give them 12 seats in Pakistan's National (Legislative) Assembly. After all, they do live in Pakistan. What concerns do they have (share) with matters in Azad Kashmir?

End of text messages and translations..

..

Now, let's listen to the Pakistani clandestine agency operative's audio response to these innocuous text messages on WhatsApp:


Here's this operative 'Kamran's phone number: 0309 9297123


I have referenced this issue in today's daily FaceBook Live video podcast, which can be accessed here. It should be remembered that such threats are rife throughout AJK & GB (as well as in Indian-controlled Jammu Kashmir & Ladakh), which solidifies the allegation that India & Pakistan's 'ground forces' in the territory of JKA devote most resources and manpower in trying to control the public narrative on either side, in favour of their respective countries.

Update: 0232hrs (03/06/2026)

Inevitably, certain alarm bells rang in response to the post above, asking for it to be deleted! 

Well, nothing of public interest has ever been deleted before, despite similar requests over the past 2 decades. Once the arrow has left the bow, there is nothing stopping it!

These tactics are ridiculously out-dated.

....

کسی نے پوچھا مکالمہ کیا ہے؟

میں نے جواب دیا

ڈائیلاگ - دلائل - تحقیق - تحریر

جموں کشمیر کی تقدیر کا فیصلہ یہاں کے لوگوں کی تدبیر سے ہونا چاہیے....

اور اس کے لیے مکالمہ کا راستہ ماہانہ، وہ وقت کی ضرورت ہے....بہت بہت شکریہ۔

 JKA PUBLIC AGENCY Note: #U214702062026 


....

Since we are on the topic of 12 refugee seats, here's an opinion piece by Shams Rehman:

# Refugee Seats: Representation or Political Intervention?
**By Shams Rehman**

The most common argument made in favour of the seats reserved in the Azad Kashmir Assembly for Kashmiri refugees settled in Pakistan is that these seats are linked to the Kashmir question and to the political identity of displaced Kashmiris living in Pakistan. It is argued that if these seats are abolished, a symbolic connection with the Kashmir dispute will be weakened and the political identity of the refugees will be undermined.

At first sight, this argument appears emotional and important. But its practical implications also need to be examined. If the purpose is only to preserve identity, symbolic representation and a political connection with the Kashmir question, then it is not necessary to give these seats a full political and governmental role in the Azad Kashmir Assembly. A better, clearer and more limited form of symbolic representation can be devised for that purpose.

For example, refugee representation could be arranged on the pattern of technical or professional representation. Alternatively, a small number of symbolic seats could be retained whose purpose is limited to consultation, identity and the expression of historical association with the Kashmir question. A separate representative forum could also be created where Kashmiri refugees settled in Pakistan may present their views, issues and political position. But they should not have a decisive role in the making or breaking of governments in Azad Kashmir, nor in the formation of ministries, budgetary allocations or Assembly majorities.

Some commentators and analysts are also trying to create the impression that the Joint Awami Action Committee does not see the corruption of those Assembly members who are elected from within the territorial limits of Azad Kashmir. In my view, this objection is misplaced. The truth is that this entire public movement has emerged precisely against corruption, clan-based politics, misuse of authority, politics of privileges and an anti-people style of governance. Therefore, turning this debate into “Kashmiri refugees settled in Pakistan versus the people of Azad Kashmir” is neither correct nor constructive.

The real question is not about insulting any community or population. The real question is about the principle of representation. If representatives elected from within Azad Kashmir are corrupt, the people can directly hold them accountable. They can protest against them. They can reject them in elections. But the refugee constituencies based in Pakistan are outside the geographical, administrative and public sphere of Azad Kashmir. Yet they continue to play a decisive role in the formation of the Azad Kashmir government, in ministries and in the distribution of public resources. That is the fundamental issue.

There is another important aspect of this debate. Refugees from Indian-administered Kashmir also live inside Azad Kashmir. The question is: who represents them? If these refugees are living within Azad Kashmir and are part of the same society, economy, administrative system and public problems, then their representation takes place through the local constituencies of Azad Kashmir. They vote in the areas where they live, they are part of the same political system, and they are directly affected by the policies of the same government. By contrast, the refugee constituencies based in Pakistan are not part of the everyday administrative sphere of Azad Kashmir.

The basic question is this: what is the practical jurisdiction of the Azad Kashmir Assembly? Constitutionally and politically, it is often viewed in the wider context of the entire state of Jammu and Kashmir. But in practical terms, this Assembly governs only the areas administered as Azad Kashmir. Its budget, administration, development schemes, government departments, local bodies, education, health, roads and day-to-day governance are directly related to the people living in Azad Kashmir. Refugee constituencies based in Pakistan are not part of this practical administrative framework.

For this reason, giving these seats decisive power in the formation of the Azad Kashmir government is neither democratically justified nor administratively reasonable. Identity and symbolic connection have their own importance, but they cannot be used to weaken the right of representation of the people of Azad Kashmir.

At this stage, the Joint Awami Action Committee should also reconsider its position of complete abolition. If a clear, limited and dignified formula of symbolic representation can be developed to preserve the Kashmir question, refugee identity and historical connection, it can be accepted in principle. The strength of people’s movements does not lie only in taking rigid positions. It also lies in proposing fair and workable solutions that protect the people’s right to self-governance while also respecting sensitive historical identities.

Similarly, the government side must abandon its delaying tactics regarding the implementation of the Muzaffarabad Agreement and electoral reforms. If the government genuinely wants to prevent the situation from moving towards confrontation, it must show seriousness, transparency and immediate practical action. Continuous delays, vague statements and time-buying politics do not reduce public anxiety; they deepen it.

The better way forward is to preserve the Kashmiri identity of the refugees, their historical status and their connection with the Kashmir question, while limiting these seats to symbolic, consultative or specific representation. This would neither break the link with the Kashmir issue, nor erase refugee identity, nor allow external constituencies to continue influencing the public mandate inside Azad Kashmir.

Let the Azad Kashmir Assembly deal with the problems of the people of Azad Kashmir. Let refugee representation be given a dignified but limited symbolic form. The Action Committee should seriously consider a workable middle path, and the government must implement agreements and reforms instead of allowing the situation to deteriorate further. 

This path is democratic, just, practical, and much closer to the real spirit of the Kashmir question.

#RightsMovementAJK 
#AzadKashmir 
#jammukashmir 
#Mirpur

end of article..

It can be accessed and read at this link on FaceBook.

..

My comment in response to the article above:

12 refugee seats and representation vis a vis 'The Kashmir Question' is a charade, not least as in practical terms every political leader from Sheikh Abdullah & Mufti Sayeed to Sardar Ibrahim & K H Khurshid were actively prevented from representing the interests of their State.

If these local leaders had little representation, what representation do the local people within the State think they are getting, let alone those living for decades and across generations in Pakistani Punjab or Indian Rajasthan?

Most of us are analysing our current predicament on the basis of well designed obfuscation by the British since 1947. Thus, self serving assumptions taught to India & Pakistan to befool the people of JKA have been considered as some kind of 'Authority' devolved to these countries by the United Nations, when in reality no such devolution occurred. We have been tricked to replace demilitarisation with devolution.

As far as the Pakistan Establishment is concerned, there is ample evidence to suggest that they are not inclined to obey public will or cater to public interest in AJK. Their country has not been designed for such a benign purpose.

In the words of the late Abdul Majeed Malik (X CJ of AJK High Court) Pakistan needs to concentrate on demilitarisation as advised by the UN, not falsely assume that they have some sort of responsibility in AJK (& GB), which even if they wanted to, they could not fulfil.

end of comment..

....

Wednesday, 5 February 2025

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 36 of 2025

1715hrs:

12 hours and 15 minutes later than it should have been. 

A day of changing directions but remaining on course. 

....

Tuesday, 4 February 2025

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 35 of 2025

0758hrs:

We are getting stronger and likewise more efficient in our approach. 

Here's a letter we have written on the LOC this morning, for the Jammu & Kashmir political and administrative fraternity on the other side of the LOC (Line of Control) or CFL (Cease Fire Line):

JKA PUBLIC AGENCY presents....

An internally created administrative framework for cross LOC (CFL) travel of the 'Riyasati' of Jammu Kashmir & Allied (areas) 

Dated: Tue 04 February 2025

Location of crossing route: 

Dhok (sub-village) Jalyari 
Moza (village) Lanjot
UC (union council) Dabsi
Tehsil (sub-division) Nikyaal
Zila (district) Kotli

Addressed to:

1) Shri Mian Altaf Ahmad Larvi
MP Lok Sabha for the Anantnag-Rajouri Constituency (JKNC) 

2) Shri Javed Ahmed Rana
Minister for Tribal Affairs and MLA Jammu & Kashmir Assembly for the Mendhar Constituency (JKNC) 

3) Shri Vikas Kundal (IAS)  
DC (Deputy Commissioner) Poonch

4) Shri Imran Rashid (JKAS) 
SDM (Sub-Divisional Magistrate) Mendhar

Dear fellow 'Riyasatis' and brothers in human kind

We at JKA PUBLIC AGENCY have for many years received written as well as verbal requests for assistance in reviving cross LOC travel for the former State subjects and current aspiring citizens of Jammu Kashmir & Allied (areas). 

Indeed, the very home in which I have been staying as a guest for the past 3 days is a home of a divided family, living in a divided village of the State viz. Lanjot, separated from their family living in the adjacent village of Gould (Gohld). 

My host climatologist Sikander Janjua son of Fateh Muhammad dearly wishes to visit his siblings and relatives to bereave the loss of his brother Muhammad Ismail Khan son of Fateh Muhammad, who died on the 29th of December 2024.

We at JKA PUBLIC AGENCY have strived for the past 2 decades to restore the fundamental rights of the people of this territory suspiciously described as Azad Jammu & Kashmir or AJK for short. 

Our methodology has always been strictly peaceful, ethical, legal and democratic in approach. It has also been recognised by various sources within the global academic and media community. 

A major term of reference is the concept of OBMs (Ownership-Building-Measures) which this writer first coined in an article (ironically) for a newspaper on your side of the divide, namely 'The Rising Kashmir' in April 2011. Less than a month later in May 2011, the concept of OBMs was referenced by a reputed academic of global stature in a UK parliamentary committee room conference and subsequently academically critiqued too. 

The aforementioned academic, the late Professor Richard Bonney has also had the perhaps unique privilege of interviewing both senior Indian and Pakistani military personnel in his exploration of opportunities for sustainable peace in this region. 

Reference:

Returning to the here and now, we wish to exercise our right to freedom of movement as guaranteed by paragraph 12 of United Nations Security Council Resolution number 47 of the 21st of April 1948 and as guaranteed by other international conventions and agreements emerging from time to time over the decades since 1947.

We understand that there prevails an administrative lacuna in cross LOC travel since 2018. We do not consider it prudent to await the forming of better relations between India & Pakistan to revive such an immediate and basic human need to visit relations, to visit holy shrines and places of significance for 'Riyasatis' or even to conduct business for mutual economic upliftment.
 
Thus, we suggest and propose a fresh cross LOC travel framework to be agreed between your administration and ours via JKA PUBLIC AGENCY.

As a trial to ensure that the life, wealth and honour of all aspiring citizens of JKA are not adversely affected; we wish to travel as a contingent of 50 people from this side of the divide from Jalyari in village Lanjot to the tehsil of Mendhar in the coming weeks.

We would address all security concerns and administrative formalities on our part and would want to clarify what security concerns and administrative formalities your side would need. 

For further reference, the ongoing case of Zubair Bhatti who wishes to return to his ancestral home in village Gould tehsil Mendhar is also worth studying:

Reference:

Overall, it should be clear to the region in particular and the world in general, that the people of AJK - especially since 2023 - have become very organised in their demands for basic rights and maintain a peaceful posture to all concerned parties & entities. They have developed the art of mobilising very quickly and in very large numbers to obtain what is rightfully theirs, without the aide of any ideology or narrowing philosophy, or indeed infringing on the due rights of others. 

Communication and negotiations with a sincere intent to realise practical solutions for humanity has finally become our norm.
 
We look forward to your responses with keen anticipation. 

Regards

Tanveer Ahmed
Founder - JKA PUBLIC AGENCY

....

The letter above was subsequently sent via registered post from the UK, to each of the 4 recipients. Here's the related documentation:

Before sending

After sending

Proof of delivery

.... 

Sunday, 2 February 2025

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 33 of 2025

0828hrs:

Just 3 hours and 28 minutes later than intended today. I did try and log in from 0600hrs onwards. 

Nevertheless....

.... 

Saturday, 1 February 2025

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 32 of 2025

1743hrs:

After that last minute fright last night, I still haven't made it a habit of logging this daily entry first thing in the morning. Or at least in the first instance when internet connectivity is available. 

One must learn fast. 

....

Friday, 31 January 2025

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 31 of 2025

2359hrs:

I almost lost my 100% record today. I had tried to log in the evening and despite wandering throughout the compound of the darbar of Mohra Sharif for over an hour, I couldn't make a connection. 

I then made another attempt just before midnight and just about succeeded, with seconds to spare. 

....

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 287 of 2026

1237hrs: Day 132 it is and I apologise for a 9 day absence. It wasn't voluntarily, rather enforced by the sudden drop in temperature and...