Visitors

Showing posts with label Muslim World. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muslim World. Show all posts

Sunday, 9 November 2025

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 313 of 2025

1458hrs:

Countdown to end of 2025: 53 days

When I thought it couldn't get any worse, today's schedule was over 9 hours behind schedule! I couldn't get to sleep till beyond 0500hrs this morning (already 2 hours behind schedule) and woke just after midday.

....

Sardar Bahadur Ali Khan can probably be described as the pioneer of peaceful rights movement in Jammu Kashmir & Allied (areas) and his life deserves scrutiny to acknowledge his efforts. We will try and get more details on his struggle for land proprietary rights in due course:

.... 

Meanwhile, our Kashmiri Pandit brother and intellectual extra-ordinaire Kuldeep Pandita of Rainawari in Srinagar, in enforced exile in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India: has more to say:

The Dichotomy of Identity

Faith and Citizenship in Muslim Communities

The statement, "We are either Muslims or Citizens; we can't be both, no matter who says what, where, or how," vividly captures a profound struggle between religious identity and national belonging. Many individuals in Muslim communities feel caught in a dichotomy where faith and citizenship are often seen as mutually exclusive due to legal, social, and political realities. Citizenship is a legal and political relationship with the state, conferring rights, responsibilities and loyalties.

It demands allegiance to national laws, values and often a secular public order. For a Muslim living in a secular democracy such as India, this can present difficult challenges—especially when state laws or social biases appear to conflict with Islamic principles or community interests. Issues around personal law, religious freedoms and political representation often highlight this tension.

In some cases, as with the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and National Register of Citizens (NRC) in India, Muslims experience fear of disenfranchisement and exclusion, reinforcing a sense that their religious and citizen identities cannot coexist without contradiction. On the other hand, being Muslim is deeply tied to faith, personal conviction and a way of life shaped by beliefs and values. This identity permeates every aspect of a believer’s existence, making it impossible to separate faith from daily living or civic participation entirely.

Islam’s ethical teachings emphasize justice, compassion and community welfare—values that resonate with the ideals of citizenship. Muslim communities across secular states have actively sought ways to reconcile these identities beyond the perceived dichotomy. Through reinterpreting Islamic teachings in line with pluralistic and democratic values, many scholars and leaders argue that Islam inherently supports principles of civic equality, religious freedom and social justice. Far from being in conflict, faith can motivate active citizenship, where contributing to the common good becomes a religious duty. Historical examples, such as the Constitution of Medina, illustrate early Islamic governance that balanced religious distinction with political unity and mutual rights.

This model underscores the possibility for Muslims to maintain faith identity while engaging as full citizens in pluralistic states. In contemporary times, Muslim citizens participate in democratic processes, social activism and interfaith dialogues, asserting their dual identity confidently. For many, civic engagement is a form of worship and social responsibility. They advocate for inclusive citizenship models that respect diversity instead of enforcing a rigid secular exclusion of religious values. This approach challenges Islamophobic and exclusionary narratives, allowing Muslim identity to flourish within civic frameworks. However, this reconciliation faces obstacles—legal restrictions, social discrimination and political marginalization continue to hamper full acceptance.

The tension between identity and belonging remains acute for many, marked by experiences of alienation and the challenge of navigating conflicting demands ,while the stark statement that Muslims must choose between faith or citizenship reflects real societal challenges, it is neither inevitable nor absolute.

Through reinterpretation, civic participation, and demand for inclusive rights, Muslim communities demonstrate that faith and citizenship can co-exist dynamically, is possible only when mankind copies the governance model that exists in Dubai etc.

....

Saturday, 14 September 2019

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 257 of 2019

0017hrs:

This following short video of the late General Hameed Gul has been doing the rounds on social media of late. It is unclear when and where this video was made, or indeed who is the Doctor Sahab that Hameed Gul is referring to. He died on August the 15th 2015 in Murree. 

In 2005, I remember making an unannounced visit to his home in Rawalpindi. He was kind enough to invite me in and we spent the next couple of hours discussing geo-politics, India-Pakistan and the 'Muslim World'. 

I wasn't inspired by the conversation and had been expecting to learn more than I actually did. Over the years, I became increasingly disillusioned by Pakistan's calculated policy on Jammu & Kashmir. In January 2010, observing General Gul share the stage with Lashkar-e-Taiba in Muzaffarabad infuriated me further.

However, every word he has uttered in this video has proved to be accurate - notwithstanding my opposition to Pakistan playing any role in Jammu & Kashmir - this must have been an exception. The old adage comes to mind: It's not who said it, it's what they said that matters:


This speech is so timely that I will translate every word of it into English here:

The speech is transcribed here in Roman Urdu - two sentences at a time - followed by the English translation

To aik taraf rakh ke jo baat karney chaley jaa rahey hain...
To phir aap kya chahtey hain?

So to put (other matters) aside the discussion we are moving towards...
So what do you want? 

Kya ye territorial issue hay?
Kya ye zameen ka maamla hay?

Is this a territorial issue?
Is this a matter of land?

Kya ye Kashmiriyo ka haq nahi ke wo apna faisla karey?
America jo jamhuriat ja alambadaar aur Bharat jo dunya ki sab se bari jamhuriat hay, wo kyou israar kar rahey hain ke Kashmir ke hissey bhakrey kiye jaey?

Do not the Kashmiris have the right to decide for themselves?
Why is the USA - the standard bearer of democracy - and India which is the world's largest democracy (both) insisting that Kashmir's various parts be divided (separated)?
  
Un ki khwaishaat ke bar aqs aur Kashmiryat 700 saal puraana aik jazba hay.
Asaani se aap us ko hata nahi saktey apney maqsad se. 

Opposite (against) their (Kashmiris) wishes and Kashmiryat is a 700 year old emotion.
You cannot divert them from their purpose so easily.

Kashmiri jaha jayega igatha jayega.
Taqseem nahi hoga.

Wherever Kashmir will go, it will go together.
It will not be divided.

Jab ke Pakistan aur Bharat dono milke aur America is me shaamil hay..shareek hay.
Wo ab ye baat kar rahey hain ke kissi tareeqay se is ko territorial issue bana ke..zameen ka maamla bana ke is ko taqseem kiya jaey.

Whereas india and Pakistan, including the USA is also involved in this (scheme)...
They are now discussing that in whatever manner this (J & K) should be made a territorial issue...into a matter of land that needs to be divided (for a durable solution).

Ye masla aisey hal nahi hoga
This is called 'out of court settlement'

This issue will not be solved in this mannner
This is called an 'out of court settlement'

Court jo hay wo Adaalat Kashmiri qoum hay
Aur us ke paas aap muqadama nahi leke jaa rahey hay

The court is the nation of Kashmir
And you are not taking this case to them

Aur aap wo cheez par lain dain kar rahey hain 
Jo aap ki nahi hay

And you are negotiating on that matter/issue
Which is not yours

Na Hindustaan ki hay
Na Pakistan ki hay Na America ki hay

It does not belong to India
Or Pakistan and it doesn't belong to the USA either 

Aur is ke andar ek bahut bara naqs hay hamaari saari approach ke andar 
Aur is ka dekhengey aap ainda aaney waaley dino me is ka izhaar hoga

And there is a great breach (of faith/contract) in our whole approach
And in the coming days you will see the expression of this 

Lekin humey min haith ul qoum kya karna hay?
Is waqt subha nahi hay ke Washington ki taraf se..mukhtalif hawaalo se bahut dabao hay hamaarey upar..

But as a (Pakistani) nation what do we have to do?
It is not yet morning that from the direction of Washington...from different references there is severe pressure on us..

Lekin kya hamaari taraf se bhi mutabaadil dabao hay apni hukumat ke upar?
Kya is sard jang ke liye - jaha idaarey mojood nahi hain - to kya qoum bhi mojood nahi hay?

But is there any alternative pressure (developed) by us on our government?
For this cold war - in the absence of institutions - is the nation also absent?

Ke kya qoum ke andar ehmiyat nahi hay ke wo kari hokey apni party waabastagiya chor ke  
...aur partiyo ki kya baat hay...partiya to saari Washington ke approval ko talaash kar rahi hain..

Does not the nation feel the importance to stand up and shed its party affiliations
...and talking of parties...all parties are seeking the approval of Washington..

Washington ki taraf dekh rahi hain tamaam ki tamaam partiya  
Is me koi istithnaa nahi

Each and every (political) party is looking towards Washington
Excluding none

To phir kya qoum isi tareeqay se har ek cheez ko gharq honey degi?
Ye sawaal aap ke saamne bhi hay..mere saamne bhi hay aur doctor sahab ke saamne bhi hay...

So will the nation in this manner allow everything to be destroyed?
This question is in front of you (the audience)..it is in front of me too and it is in front of Doctor Sahab... 

Bahut shukrya....


Thank you very much....

End of speech....

.....

A list has been published of the 37 activists detained in Hajeera for marching towards the LOC, for a sit-in protest (dharna) at Tithrinote on the 7th of September in solidarity with their co-citizens across the LOC, who have entered their 40th day of an unprecedented curfew. These local activists are into their 8th day of incarceration:





........

Wednesday, 11 September 2019

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 254 of 2019

0246hrs:

It boils down to this:


.......

My sentiments entirely and for some years now:





The text in the FB post above reads as:

One of the rarest video on Kashmir in original dubbing. I still believe Maharaja Karan Singh has a greater role to play in the present scenario. Jai ho !

End of text in FB post......

Hence, my comment above the video.

.... 

They covered the sit-in protest (dharna) at the LOC in Poonch a couple of days ago and today Al Jazeera have published an opinion piece by an exiled Pakistani journalist Taha Siddiqui:



.......

Friday, 7 June 2019

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 158 of 2019

0317hrs:

3 Layers and Multiple Sub-layers in each Layer of the Jammu & Kashmir Dispute:


There appear to be 3 layers of power (with accompanying narrative/s) relevant to understanding the unresolved dispute of Jammu & Kashmir. Both modus vivendi and modus operandi are in use in different measure and combination, within and between each layer.

1) United Kingdom (Great Britain/Empire)

Sub-layers would include the international community with a mixture of combining and separating almost everything beyond India & Pakistan. That would be Western/global institutions viz. UN, IMF, World Bank, the wider region including China, Central Asia, Russia and the Muslim World.

2) India & Pakistan

Sub-layers would include all narratives; be they hawks or doves, or left and right of the political spectrum in both countries, They would also include both those who don't want the world to interfere in the domestic affairs of either State and those that do, or don't mind.

3) Jammu & Kashmir (J & K)

This would include the whole princely State of c. 86,000 square miles. Of course the divided population is also going to comprise of a diverse range of sub-layers. Some pulling towards the Indian narrative, some towards the Pakistani narrative, some espousing other narratives linked to other external entities and then a perhaps even more diverse group representing an internal narrative of some kind.

Now, in the power equation the numbers 1 to 3 are in the right sequence, in more respects than one. During the colonial era, there were 2 tiers or layers (in our contextual parlance): that of the British Crown and its subjects. Thus, there is history, geopolitics, economy, technology, research and a host of other factors that cement the sequence in place.   

I realise that not all readers will be predisposed to accepting such a sequence. However, most people who follow the status of Jammu & Kashmir's geopolitical ambiguity will at least concede that any conscientious inhabitant of this territory - who may be deprived of all his or her fundamental rights at will - may reasonably make such an assessment. Further, the reader should also take into account the prevailing status-quo since the ceremonial transfer of British colonial power to the dominions of India and Pakistan in 1947. The gradual dwindling of internal political agency - be it the autocratic ruler or his subjects - including those acting as political representatives of the people - should also be noted.

If we assume the above as a 3-layered geopolitical power hierarchy, the challenges facing the civil rights activist in any part of J & K - to achieve public policy objectives in favour of the internal narrative/s - are as necessary to meet in 2019 as they have proved elusive since 1947.

Our shared humanity requires us to accept everything we expect for ourselves as a fundamental right to be available or exercised by all other homo sapiens. There is a deeper level of thinking needed beyond 'national' limitations to meet the seemingly ever more complex needs of tomorrow. 

Can the internal narrative of J & K triumph for the sake of humanity?

How does it navigate through the 3 layers of geopolitical hierarchy?

How does it interact with the multiple sub-layers within and between other layers?

All real and tough questions that need understanding. 

I need internal assistance.

.......


This is heartbreaking but poignant:





Translation of caption from FB:


In the Indian controlled Valley of Kashmir, a mother bought some new Eid clothes for her slain child and laid them out on his grave. 


"Those clothes that you demanded last Eid


Get up and look! I've brought you those very clothes" 

......


It's a pity that we are closed to the world. Otherwise, we'd be popular much beyond Pakistan:




For those of you who cannot read the FB photo caption:


Tourists throng AJK and adjoining areas of Pakistan during Eid holidays. This is Kohala resort


......


Indian and Pakistani armed forces can enjoy a good time together, even if it may be a few thousand miles away in Chebarkul, Russia. It is not as unthinkable as the residents on either side of Jammu Kashmir & Allied's manufactured border are led to believe, or for that matter even the world is led to believe. 

Contingents of Pakistani and Indian armies were participating in a joint multinational exercise organised under the umbrella of The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), or Shanghai Pact, in Russia. 

The exercises began on August the 24th 2018 and concluded on August the 30th 2018.

We understand that this footage is from the evening of the 28th of August 2018:
   


Cheers!

......

Daily Diary (DD) - Day 240 of 2026

0435hrs: Day 85 of a totally needless war - from the point of view of 90% of the people of AJK - but totally & desperately necessary fro...