2221hrs:
The Pakistani State narrative tried to confront the internal narrative in Bhimber city today. The Pakistani State's illegal agency operatives tried their best to prevent activists of the Jammu Kashmir People's National Alliance (JKPNA) from distributing pamphlets to the public of Bhimber. However, they were thwarted by a firm civil society response and outrage from other parts of AJK and its diaspora. As explained hitherto, the AJK police are also a part of this society and thus share similar sentiments with the public. This sentiment can be encapsulated in the following messages:
Obviously this second image will have to be translated. Thus:
We vociferously condemn the illegality of the cowardly administration of Bhimber, which - without reason - kept Kashmiris under duress and stopped the public from propagating the truth.
End of translation....
It should be remembered that the word 'administration' is a euphemism for Pakistan's agencies which are now desperately trying to protect their country's narrative in AJK but with decreasing effect.
....
Earlier, the following speech of the AJK prime minister made waves for its uncustomary bold advice to the Pakistani State, to effectively take a back seat in matters related to J & K:
Parts of his speech was censored too, which increased the intrigue surrounding it:
.....
A British MEP has been busy discussing us in the European Parliament too:
However, as with all previous advocacy by British politicians, we urge them to stop thinking along bilateral terms. Here's my response to Phillip Bennion on his post:
We agree with most of your suggestions and analysis. We also thank you for your pro-active stance on this delicate issue.
However, we do not think this issue can be resolved by India and Pakistan with an international mediator, even if it included Kashmiri representatives. That is a very unlikely scenario and even if it were to proceed thus, there would be little that the exclusive inheritors of this territory could claim.
As someone who lives and thrives in a functioning democracy why do you not make suggestions for J & K that you would want for yourself if - God Forbid - the UK were to be occupied by France and Germany?
Please support an internal political process in J & K without external interference. The world should accept a solution democratically created within J & K rather than open it further to regional and international intrigue.
End of my comment...
.....
This gentleman should not be forgotten. In fact, it could be said that our previous 200 years of history begins with him:
....
Isn't it interesting that barely a day after the Pathan tribesmen are sent on a State sponsored visit to provoke the citizens of AJK into helping them repeat the horrors of 1947, the Pakistani prime minister has this to say:
.......
Obviously this second image will have to be translated. Thus:
We vociferously condemn the illegality of the cowardly administration of Bhimber, which - without reason - kept Kashmiris under duress and stopped the public from propagating the truth.
End of translation....
It should be remembered that the word 'administration' is a euphemism for Pakistan's agencies which are now desperately trying to protect their country's narrative in AJK but with decreasing effect.
....
Earlier, the following speech of the AJK prime minister made waves for its uncustomary bold advice to the Pakistani State, to effectively take a back seat in matters related to J & K:
PM AJK @farooq_pm in National Parliamentary conference#Kashmir isn't a territorial Dispute Between #India and #Pakistan.— Usman Tariq Chughtai (@UsmanTariqUSK) September 18, 2019
Pakistan Should Facilitate Us to represent our Case on international level because international community wants to listen us not to Pakistan#FreeKashmir pic.twitter.com/qyjGSBJYFB
Parts of his speech was censored too, which increased the intrigue surrounding it:
So much for the #KashmirCause https://t.co/4KMF14w4vl— Taha Siddiqui (@TahaSSiddiqui) September 18, 2019
.....
A British MEP has been busy discussing us in the European Parliament too:
However, as with all previous advocacy by British politicians, we urge them to stop thinking along bilateral terms. Here's my response to Phillip Bennion on his post:
We agree with most of your suggestions and analysis. We also thank you for your pro-active stance on this delicate issue.
However, we do not think this issue can be resolved by India and Pakistan with an international mediator, even if it included Kashmiri representatives. That is a very unlikely scenario and even if it were to proceed thus, there would be little that the exclusive inheritors of this territory could claim.
As someone who lives and thrives in a functioning democracy why do you not make suggestions for J & K that you would want for yourself if - God Forbid - the UK were to be occupied by France and Germany?
Please support an internal political process in J & K without external interference. The world should accept a solution democratically created within J & K rather than open it further to regional and international intrigue.
End of my comment...
.....
This gentleman should not be forgotten. In fact, it could be said that our previous 200 years of history begins with him:
....
Isn't it interesting that barely a day after the Pathan tribesmen are sent on a State sponsored visit to provoke the citizens of AJK into helping them repeat the horrors of 1947, the Pakistani prime minister has this to say:
"If anyone from Pakistan goes to India and he thinks he will fight in Kashmir or will conduct jihad, the first person he will be inflicting cruelty on is Kashmiris. He will have acted as an enemy to Kashmiris," says Pakistani PM Khan in Torkham. https://t.co/ED0zpikQJ3— Asad Hashim (@AsadHashim) September 18, 2019
.......
